Compare commits

..

6 commits

3 changed files with 149 additions and 0 deletions

3
.markdownlint.yaml Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
# MD024/no-duplicate-heading/no-duplicate-header
MD024:
siblings_only: true

View file

@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ params:
webmentions: webmentions:
login: belanyi.fr login: belanyi.fr
pingback: true pingback: true
mathjax: true
taxonomies: taxonomies:
category: "categories" category: "categories"

View file

@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
---
title: "Reservoir Sampling"
date: 2024-08-02T18:30:56+01:00
draft: false # I don't care for draft mode, git has branches for that
description: "Elegantly sampling a stream"
tags:
- algorithms
- python
categories:
- programming
series:
- Cool algorithms
favorite: false
disable_feed: false
mathjax: true
---
[_Reservoir Sampling_][reservoir] is an [online][online], probabilistic
algorithm to uniformly sample $k$ random elements out of a stream of values.
It's a particularly elegant and small algorithm, only requiring $\Theta(k)$
amount of space and a single pass through the stream.
[reservoir]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reservoir_sampling
[online]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_algorithm
<!--more-->
## Sampling one element
As an introduction, we'll first focus on fairly sampling one element from the
stream.
```python
def sample_one[T](stream: Iterable[T]) -> T:
stream_iter = iter(stream)
# Sample the first element
res = next(stream_iter)
for i, val in enumerate(stream_iter, start=1):
j = random.randint(0, i)
# Replace the sampled element with probability 1/(i + 1)
if j == 0:
res = val
# Return the randomly sampled element
return res
```
### Proof
Let's now prove that this algorithm leads to a fair sampling of the stream.
We'll be doing proof by induction.
#### Hypothesis $H_N$
After iterating through the first $N$ items in the stream,
each of them has had an equal $\frac{1}{N}$ probability of being selected as
`res`.
#### Base Case $H_1$
We can trivially observe that the first element is always assigned to `res`,
$\frac{1}{1} = 1$, the hypothesis has been verified.
#### Inductive Case
For a given $N$, let us assume that $H_N$ holds. Let us now look at the events
of loop iteration where `i = N` (i.e: observation of the $N + 1$-th item in the
stream).
`j = random.randint(0, i)` uniformly selects a value in the range $[0, i]$,
a.k.a $[0, N]$. We then have two cases:
* `j == 0`, with probability $\frac{1}{N + 1}$: we select `val` as the new
reservoir element `res`.
* `j != 0`, with probability $\frac{N}{N + 1}$: we keep the previous value of
`res`. By $H_N$, any of the first $N$ elements had a $\frac{1}{N}$ probability
of being `res` before at the start of the loop, each element now has a
probability $\frac{1}{N} \cdot \frac{N}{N + 1} = \frac{1}{N + 1}$ of being the
element.
And thus, we have proven $H_{N + 1}$ at the end of the loop.
## Sampling $k$ element
The code for sampling $k$ elements is very similar to the one-element case.
```python
def sample[T](stream: Iterable[T], k: int = 1) -> list[T]:
stream_iter = iter(stream)
# Retain the first 'k' elements in the reservoir
res = list(itertools.islice(stream_iter, k))
for i, val in enumerate(stream_iter, start=k):
j = random.randint(0, i)
# Replace one element at random with probability k/(i + 1)
if j < k:
res[j] = val
# Return 'k' randomly sampled elements
return res
```
### Proof
Let us once again do a proof by induction, assuming the stream contains at least
$k$ items.
#### Hypothesis $H_N$
After iterating through the first $N$ items in the stream, each of them has had
an equal $\frac{k}{N}$ probability of being sampled from the stream.
#### Base Case $H_k$
We can trivially observe that the first $k$ element are sampled at the start of
the algorithm, $\frac{k}{k} = 1$, the hypothesis has been verified.
#### Inductive Case
For a given $N$, let us assume that $H_N$ holds. Let us now look at the events
of the loop iteration where `i = N`, in order to prove $H_{N + 1}$.
`j = random.randint(0, i)` uniformly selects a value in the range $[0, i]$,
a.k.a $[0, N]$. We then have three cases:
* `j >= k`, with probability $1 - \frac{k}{N + 1}$: we do not modify the
sampled reservoir at all.
* `j < k`, with probability $\frac{k}{N + 1}$: we sample the new element to
replace the `j`-th element of the reservoir. Therefore for any element
$e \in [0, k[$ we can either have:
* $j = e$: the element _is_ replaced, probability $\frac{1}{k}$.
* $j \neq e$: the element is _not_ replaced, probability $\frac{k - 1}{k}$.
We can now compute the probability that a previously sampled element is kept in
the reservoir:
$1 - \frac{k}{N + 1} + \frac{k}{N + 1} \cdot \frac{k - 1}{k} = \frac{N}{N + 1}$.
By $H_N$, any of the first $N$ elements had a $\frac{k}{N}$ probability
of being sampled before at the start of the loop, each element now has a
probability $\frac{k}{N} \cdot \frac{N}{N + 1} = \frac{k}{N + 1}$ of being the
element.
We have now proven that all elements have a probability $\frac{k}{N + 1}$ of
being sampled at the end of the loop, therefore $H_{N + 1}$ has been verified.