Add Reservoir Sampling post
This commit is contained in:
commit
11db5a27b9
3
.markdownlint.yaml
Normal file
3
.markdownlint.yaml
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|||
# MD024/no-duplicate-heading/no-duplicate-header
|
||||
MD024:
|
||||
siblings_only: true
|
|
@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ params:
|
|||
webmentions:
|
||||
login: belanyi.fr
|
||||
pingback: true
|
||||
mathjax: true
|
||||
|
||||
taxonomies:
|
||||
category: "categories"
|
||||
|
|
145
content/posts/2024-08-02-reservoir-sampling/index.md
Normal file
145
content/posts/2024-08-02-reservoir-sampling/index.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: "Reservoir Sampling"
|
||||
date: 2024-08-02T18:30:56+01:00
|
||||
draft: false # I don't care for draft mode, git has branches for that
|
||||
description: "Elegantly sampling a stream"
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- algorithms
|
||||
- python
|
||||
categories:
|
||||
- programming
|
||||
series:
|
||||
- Cool algorithms
|
||||
favorite: false
|
||||
disable_feed: false
|
||||
mathjax: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[_Reservoir Sampling_][reservoir] is an [online][online], probabilistic
|
||||
algorithm to uniformly sample $k$ random elements out of a stream of values.
|
||||
|
||||
It's a particularly elegant and small algorithm, only requiring $\Theta(k)$
|
||||
amount of space and a single pass through the stream.
|
||||
|
||||
[reservoir]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reservoir_sampling
|
||||
[online]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_algorithm
|
||||
|
||||
<!--more-->
|
||||
|
||||
## Sampling one element
|
||||
|
||||
As an introduction, we'll first focus on fairly sampling one element from the
|
||||
stream.
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def sample_one[T](stream: Iterable[T]) -> T:
|
||||
stream_iter = iter(stream)
|
||||
# Sample the first element
|
||||
res = next(stream_iter)
|
||||
for i, val in enumerate(stream_iter, start=1):
|
||||
j = random.randint(0, i)
|
||||
# Replace the sampled element with probability 1/(i + 1)
|
||||
if j == 0:
|
||||
res = val
|
||||
# Return the randomly sampled element
|
||||
return res
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Proof
|
||||
|
||||
Let's now prove that this algorithm leads to a fair sampling of the stream.
|
||||
|
||||
We'll be doing proof by induction.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Hypothesis $H_N$
|
||||
|
||||
After iterating through the first $N$ items in the stream,
|
||||
each of them has had an equal $\frac{1}{N}$ probability of being selected as
|
||||
`res`.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Base Case $H_1$
|
||||
|
||||
We can trivially observe that the first element is always assigned to `res`,
|
||||
$\frac{1}{1} = 1$, the hypothesis has been verified.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Inductive Case
|
||||
|
||||
For a given $N$, let us assume that $H_N$ holds. Let us now look at the events
|
||||
of loop iteration where `i = N` (i.e: observation of the $N + 1$-th item in the
|
||||
stream).
|
||||
|
||||
`j = random.randint(0, i)` uniformly selects a value in the range $[0, i]$,
|
||||
a.k.a $[0, N]$. We then have two cases:
|
||||
|
||||
* `j == 0`, with probability $\frac{1}{N + 1}$: we select `val` as the new
|
||||
reservoir element `res`.
|
||||
|
||||
* `j != 0`, with probability $\frac{N}{N + 1}$: we keep the previous value of
|
||||
`res`. By $H_N$, any of the first $N$ elements had a $\frac{1}{N}$ probability
|
||||
of being `res` before at the start of the loop, each element now has a
|
||||
probability $\frac{1}{N} \cdot \frac{N}{N + 1} = \frac{1}{N + 1}$ of being the
|
||||
element.
|
||||
|
||||
And thus, we have proven $H_{N + 1}$ at the end of the loop.
|
||||
|
||||
## Sampling $k$ element
|
||||
|
||||
The code for sampling $k$ elements is very similar to the one-element case.
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def sample[T](stream: Iterable[T], k: int = 1) -> list[T]:
|
||||
stream_iter = iter(stream)
|
||||
# Retain the first 'k' elements in the reservoir
|
||||
res = list(itertools.islice(stream_iter, k))
|
||||
for i, val in enumerate(stream_iter, start=k):
|
||||
j = random.randint(0, i)
|
||||
# Replace one element at random with probability k/(i + 1)
|
||||
if j < k:
|
||||
res[j] = val
|
||||
# Return 'k' randomly sampled elements
|
||||
return res
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Proof
|
||||
|
||||
Let us once again do a proof by induction, assuming the stream contains at least
|
||||
$k$ items.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Hypothesis $H_N$
|
||||
|
||||
After iterating through the first $N$ items in the stream, each of them has had
|
||||
an equal $\frac{k}{N}$ probability of being sampled from the stream.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Base Case $H_k$
|
||||
|
||||
We can trivially observe that the first $k$ element are sampled at the start of
|
||||
the algorithm, $\frac{k}{k} = 1$, the hypothesis has been verified.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Inductive Case
|
||||
|
||||
For a given $N$, let us assume that $H_N$ holds. Let us now look at the events
|
||||
of the loop iteration where `i = N`, in order to prove $H_{N + 1}$.
|
||||
|
||||
`j = random.randint(0, i)` uniformly selects a value in the range $[0, i]$,
|
||||
a.k.a $[0, N]$. We then have three cases:
|
||||
|
||||
* `j >= k`, with probability $1 - \frac{k}{N + 1}$: we do not modify the
|
||||
sampled reservoir at all.
|
||||
|
||||
* `j < k`, with probability $\frac{k}{N + 1}$: we sample the new element to
|
||||
replace the `j`-th element of the reservoir. Therefore for any element
|
||||
$e \in [0, k[$ we can either have:
|
||||
* $j = e$: the element _is_ replaced, probability $\frac{1}{k}$.
|
||||
* $j \neq e$: the element is _not_ replaced, probability $\frac{k - 1}{k}$.
|
||||
|
||||
We can now compute the probability that a previously sampled element is kept in
|
||||
the reservoir:
|
||||
$1 - \frac{k}{N + 1} + \frac{k}{N + 1} \cdot \frac{k - 1}{k} = \frac{N}{N + 1}$.
|
||||
|
||||
By $H_N$, any of the first $N$ elements had a $\frac{k}{N}$ probability
|
||||
of being sampled before at the start of the loop, each element now has a
|
||||
probability $\frac{k}{N} \cdot \frac{N}{N + 1} = \frac{k}{N + 1}$ of being the
|
||||
element.
|
||||
|
||||
We have now proven that all elements have a probability $\frac{k}{N + 1}$ of
|
||||
being sampled at the end of the loop, therefore $H_{N + 1}$ has been verified.
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue